The Postmodern Paradigm: Shaping the Philosophy for the Future Landscape of Public Administration

Article
Open Access
by Valerii Akopian1, Kostyantyn Zakharenko2 and Tetiana Zhyzhko3
1 Dragomanov Ukrainian State University (Kyiv, Ukraine)
2 Dragomanov Ukrainian State University (Kyiv, Ukraine)
3 Dragomanov Ukrainian State University (Kyiv, Ukraine)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/32/5
Received: 6 September 2023 / Accepted: 19 October 2023 / Published: 5 February 2024

View Full-Text Review Reports Cite This Paper

Abstract

This article delves into the profound impact of postmodernism on the trajectory and evolution of future public administration. The 20th century witnessed radical changes in worldview, marking the transition from modernity to postmodernity. The basic principles of postmodernism, encompassing deconstruction, fragmentation, future shock, and cultural relativism, have instigated a paradigm shift challenging traditional administrative frameworks (M. Foucault, J.-F. Lyotard, A. Toffler, etc.). The article explores how these postmodern tenets influence administrative practices, power structures, and the very nature of governance. Postmodernity is characterized by a unique attitude towards truth, acknowledging its relativity, and by decentration, the absence of a single center, replaced by multipolarity and globalization. “Post-truth” replaces truth, posing new challenges to the future of public administration. The public administration of the future will be shaped by existing trends, including Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), etc. It will also depend on modern technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, data analysis, and data-driven decision-making, as underscored by the need for digitalization in response to the pandemic (according to EIB). However, alongside advantages, there are also challenges, such as issues of liability in the use of AI for future public administration. These risks can be mitigated through collaborative and participatory governance models, adaptive leadership, an emphasis on inclusivity, diversity, and social equity, addressing environmental concerns, advanced training courses, and other strategic measures.

Keywords: Philosophy, Postmodernism, Public Administration, Future Governance, Technological Impact.

References

Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008) Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Arendt, H. & Kohn, J. (2005). Essays in Understanding 1930-1954: Formation Exile and Totalitarianism. Schocken Books.

Bouckaert, G. (2020) From Public Administration in Utopia to Utopia in Public Administration. In G. Bouckaert & W. Jann (Eds.), European Perspectives for Public Administration: The Way Forward (pp. 71–84). Leuven University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvv417th.8

Brahms, Y. (2020) Philosophy of Post-Truth. Institute for National Security Studies.

Burke, B. F. (2007) Adaptive Leadership as a Facilitator of Public Engagement on Environmental Sustainability Issues. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 29(3): 412-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2007.11029604

Canfora, P., Antonopoulos, I. S., Dri, M., Gaudillat, P. and Schönberger, H. (2019) Best Environmental Management Practice for the Public Administration Sector, JRC Science for Policy Report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/952965

Dator, J., Pratt, D. and Seo, Y. (2006) What Is Globalization? In Fairness, Globalization, and Public Institutions: East Asia and Beyond, 13-18. University of Hawai’s Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv3zp081.5

EIB Investment Report 2021/2022: Recovery as a springboard for change. (2022) European Investment Bank.

Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Harvester Press, London.

Hou, Y., Ni, A., Poocharoen, O., Yang, K and Zhao, Z. (2010) The Case for Public Administration with a Global Perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21: 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq070

Karpenko, O., Zaporozhets, T., Tsedik, M., Vasiuk, N. and Osmak, A. (2023) Digital Transformations of Public Administration in Countries with Transition Economies. European Review, 31(6): 569-588. https://doi:10.1017/S1062798723000522

Kettl, D. & Fessler, J. (2009) The Politics of the Administrative Process. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester University Press.

Marsilio, M., Cappellaro, G. and Cuccurullo, C. (2011) The Intellectual Structure Of Research Into PPPs. Public Management Review, 13(6): 763-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.539112

McCann, G. and McCloskey, S. (2015) From the Local to the Global: Key Issues in Development Studies. Pluto Press Marston Book Services Limited distributor.

Menzel, D. C. and White, J. D. (2015) The State of Public Administration: Issues Challenges and Opportunities. Routledge.

Santoni de Sio, F., and Mecacci, G. (2021) Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them. Philosophy and Technology, 34(4), 1057-1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00450-x

Sheehy, B. (2015) Defining CSR: Problems and Solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3): 625-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x

Toffler, A. (2022). Future Shock. Ballantine Books.

Vincent, Ch., Nripendra, P. R. and Lemuria, C. (2022) Artificial Intelligence for data-driven decision-making and governance in public affairs. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4): 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101742

Volkova, N. (2023) Principles of Professional Development of Civil Servants in the Conditions of European Integration. Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald. Series: Public Management and Administration, 1(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.54891/2786-698X-2023-1-6

White, J. D. and Adams, G. B. (1995) Reason and Postmodernity: The Historical and Social Context of Public Administration Research and Theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 17(1), 1-18.

Wilder-Smith, A. and Osman, S. (2020). Public Health Emergencies of International Concern: A Historic Overview. Journal of Travel Medicine, 27(8), taaa227. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa227

Share and Cite

Akopian, Valerii, Kostyantyn Zakharenko and Tetiana Zhyzhko (2024) The Postmodern Paradigm: Shaping the Philosophy for the Future Landscape of Public Administration. Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 32, 74-86. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/32/5
Back to the list of Articles