The Hermeneutic Challenge in Quantum Physics

Article
Open Access
by Heitor Matallo Jr1
1 Federal University of Piaui (Teresina, Pi, Brazil)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/35/7
Received: 15 April 2025 / Accepted: 2 June 2025 / Published: 10 October 2025

View Full-Text Review Reports Cite This Paper

Abstract

This article examines quantum physics’ interpretive challenges through philosophical hermeneutics, arguing that the persistent confusion in understanding quantum phenomena stems not only from theoretical complexity, but from a hermeneutic deficit – a gap in how meaning is constructed, communicated, and contested within and beyond the scientific community. Drawing on Hans-Georg Gadamer’s (2004) notion of a crisis of intelligibility, we suggest that quantum theory has entered a phase where its formal success is undercut by interpretative fragmentation. This deficit manifests in two interconnected domains. First, in scientific communication, where metaphors like “particles that decide” or “observers creating reality” promote anthropomorphized misunderstandings. Second, and more fundamentally, within scientific practice itself, where the plurality of interpretations – Copenhagen, Bohmian, QBism – reveals that meaning in quantum physics is not derived from equations alone, but from contextual, socially embedded epistemic cultures (Knorr-Cetina, 1999).Rather than treating interpretations as deviations from an ideal objectivity, we propose a hermeneutic reframing: interpretations are dynamic constructs, shaped by experimental systems, disciplinary norms, and institutional choices. To unpack this, the first section draws on Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (1977) and Knorr-Cetina (1999) to outline how quantum theory evolves not through isolated theorizing but through materially grounded practices. In doing so, we aim to move beyond the “interpretive regress” (Collins, 2010) toward a productive hermeneutic model of quantum meaning-making.

Keywords: Quantum interpretation, philosophical hermeneutics, science communication, metaphor analysis, quantum education.

References

Allchin, D. (2013) Problematic uses of evolutionary theory in science education. Science & Education, 22(10), 2487-2500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9572-3

Bächtold, M. (2018) What do students “construct” according to constructivism in science education? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 67, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.11.004

Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

Bell, J. S. (1964) On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics Physique Физика, 1(3), 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueФизика.1.195

Biagioli, M. (2006) Galileo’s Instruments of Credit. Chicago UP.

Bohr, N. (1934) Atomic theory and the description of nature. Cambridge University Press.

Bohr, N. (1962) Essays 1958-1962 on atomic physics and human knowledge. Wiley.

Bokulich, A. (2008) Reexamining the Quantum-Classical Relation. Cambridge UP.

Cartwright, N. (1983) How the laws of physics lie. Oxford University Press.

Collins, H. (2010) Tacit and explicit knowledge. University of Chicago Press.

Couder, Y., and Fort, E. (2006) Single-Particle Diffraction and Interference at a Macroscopic Scale. Physical Review Letters, 97(15), 154101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.154101

Daston, L. (2000) Biographies of scientific objects. University of Chicago Press.

Dunne, R. et al. (2021) Metaphor Processing in Quantum Physics. Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(2), 45-67.

Elby, A. (2001) Helping physics students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics, 69(S1), 54-64.

Falkenburg, B. (2007) Particle metaphysics: A critical account of subatomic reality. Springer.

Favrholdt, D. (1992) Niels Bohr’s philosophical writings. Vol. 5. Springer.

Fuchs, C. (2010) QBism, the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism. https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5209

Fuchs, C. et al. (2014) QBism and the Greeks. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 55(8), 082102.

Galison, P. (1997) Image and Logic. University of Chicago Press.

Galison, P. (1997) Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press.

Gentner, D. and Jeziorski, M. (1993) The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science. Metaphor and Thought, 2, 447-480.

Giere, R. N. (2006) Scientific perspectivism. University of Chicago Press.

Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and intervening. Cambridge University Press.

Heisenberg, W. (1958) Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. Harper & Row.

Kaiser, D. (2011) How the hippies saved physics: Science, counterculture, and the quantum revival. W.W. Norton.

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures. Harvard University Press.

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.

Kwiat, P., et al. (1999) Ultra-bright source of polarization-entangled photons. Physical Review A, 60(2), R773-R776. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.R773

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago UP.

Laudan, L. (1981) A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science, 48(1), 19-49. https://doi.org/10.1086/288975

Marshman, E. and Singh, C. (2015) Student Understanding of Quantum Superposition. Physical Review PER, 11(2), 020119.

Mermin, N. D. (1989) What’s wrong with this pillow? Physics Today, 42(4), 9-11. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2810963

Nature Editorial. (2023) The Quantum Investment Bubble. Nature, 615(7954), 764.

Niebert, K., et al. (2012) Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, 96(5), 849-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21026

Petersen, A. (1985) The Philosophy of Niels Bohr. North-Holland.

Pickering, A. (1995) The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press.

Resnik, D. (1998) The Ethics of Science. Routledge.

Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997) Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Stanford University Press.

Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997) Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford University Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1976) Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas Christian University Press.

Rosenfeld, L. (1963) The measuring process in quantum mechanics. Supplement of the Progress of Theoretical Physics, 222, 1-42.

Rosenfeld, L. (1963b) Misunderstandings about the Foundations of Quantum Theory. In Observation and Interpretation: A Symposium of Philosophers and Physicists (S. Körner, Ed.), pp. 41-45. Butterworths Scientific Publications.

Rosenfeld, L. (1963b) Niels Bohr’s contribution to epistemology. Physics Today, 16(10), 47-54.

Rovelli, C. (1996) Relational quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35(8), 1637-1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302261

Rovelli, C. (1996) Relational Quantum Mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35(8), 1637-1678.

Schrödinger, E. (1935) Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31(4), 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100013554

Sokal, A. (2008) Beyond the hoax: Science, philosophy, and culture. Oxford University Press.

Thagard, P. (2022) Analogy and conceptual change. Cognitive Science, 46(3), e13123.

Wigner, E. P. (1963) The problem of measurement. American Journal of Physics, 31(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1969254

Wüthrich, A. (2020) Teaching interpretation in quantum mechanics. Science & Education, 29(4), 869-891.

Zeh, H. D. (1970) On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory. Foundations of Physics, 1(1), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708656

Share and Cite

Matallo Jr, Heitor (2025) The Hermeneutic Challenge in Quantum Physics. Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 35, 184-194. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/35/7
Back to the list of Articles