by
Igor Gudyma1
1 Mariupol State University (Cherkasy, Ukraine)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/30/9
Received: 7 July 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 5 February 2023
This brief article examines the features of the panentheistic cosmology of the Protestant theologian Arthur Peacock, with particular attention to the conceptualization of divine immanence in his theological system. In addition, it reveals the organic connection between the categories of “faith” and “miracle” in Protestant theology, and shows the place and role of a miracle in the theological constructions of panentheism. All main conceptualizations of the philosopher and theologian Arthur Peacock are reduced to the so-called “panentheism formula”, according to which God is immanent in the universe, truly omnipresent, but his Being is not entirely reduced to natural, God is greater than nature and his Being surpasses nature. Having laid down the initial principles of his panentheistic cosmology, Peacock deductively deduces all the further key provisions of his concept, namely: the doctrine of the nature of the relationship between God and the world, the question of a miracle as a personal manifestation of the divine, etc. In the author’s worldview, the world acts as an arena and an instrument for achieving God of large-scale cosmic goals. However, in the ideas about the interaction of God with the world, the theologian also singles out the symbolic aspect, the main content of which is the initiative of God to reveal his Personality and demonstrate to man his divine nature. In other words, we are talking about the relationship of God with the individual and the human community, which reflects the creative essence of God and presupposes the existence of events that reveal important religious truths. In general, it should be recognized that the theorists of panentheism, including Arthur Peacock himself, made a significant contribution to the dialogue between religion and science, which was noted by researchers. However, wishing to preserve the intellectual respectability of their conceptualizations, the ideologists of panentheism bypass or extremely carefully and extremely correctly touch on individual complex problems of theology, the features of divine immanence, incl. and the question of miracle. All cases of the relationship between God and man, including the most extraordinary and super-intense experience of interpersonal communication, can, in their opinion, be more convincingly described in ordinary terms within the framework of their model of “downward influence” on the world, mediated by the components of this world.
Keywords: panentheism, theology, God, faith, science, miracle
Attfield, R. (2019) Panentheisms, Creation and Evil, published by De Gruyter.
Open Theology, No 5, 166-181.
Barbour, I. (2003) Science and Religion, Models and Relations. N.R. Howell and J.W. Van Huyssteen, eds.: Encyclopedia of science and religion. New York: Macmillan Reference.
Beginning with the end. God, Science, and Wolfhart Pannenberg (1999) Edited by Carol Rausch Albright and Joel Haugen Open Court Chicago and La Salle, Illinois. Contingency, Time, and the Theological Ambiguity of Science. Willem B. Dree. March 26, 1999, 217-247.
Brodrick, R. (2012) From Divine Action to Divine Presence: The Next Step in an Integrated Cosmology of Science and Theology. Boston College. Lumen et Vita. Vol. 2, 1-15.
Engel, Torbjørn W. (2008) Speaking of God in an Age of Science. REL-3901: Masteroppgave studieretning i teologi Institutt for religionsvitenskap Det samfunnsvitenskapelige fakultet Universitetet i Tromsø.
Grünbaum, A. (2004) The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4): 561-614.
Herman J. Pietersen. Professor, University of Limpopo (2014) Science and Religion in Meta-Perspective – Part II. Turfloop Campus 0727, Republic of South Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol 5. No 20. September 2014. 2151-2163.
Peacocke, A.R. (2004a) Creation and the world of science: The re-shaping of belief. 2nd paperback edition ed., original publication: 1979. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peacocke, A.R. (2004b) Evolution, the disguised friend of faith? Selected essays Philadelphia; London: Templeton Foundation Press.
Peacocke, A.R. (1993) Theology for a scientific age: being and becoming – natural, divine, and human. 1st Fortress Press ed., original publication: 1990. Minneapolis: Fortress Press
Share and Cite
Gudyma, Igor (2023) Divine Immanence in the Panentheistic Cosmology of Arthur Peacock. Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 30, 97-104. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/30/9