The Discourse of Humanism in the Context of the Civilizational Process in the 21st century

Article
Open Access
by Valerii Akopian1 and Viktoriya Timashova 2
1 Mykhailo Drahomanov Ukrainian State University (Kyiv, Ukraine)
2 Mykhailo Drahomanov Ukrainian State University (Kyiv, Ukraine)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/30/2
Received: 14 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 December 2022 / Published: 5 February 2023

View Full-Text Review Reports Cite This Paper

Abstract

The article explores the concept of humanism both in modern discourse and in historical retrospective. Human has always been at the center of philosophy, regardless of what spheres of being were studied. Anthropology, cultural studies, psychology, philosophy, and many other sciences explore various manifestations of a person, all of which are ultimately designed to answer perhaps one of the most critical questions – what makes us human? However, this discourse significantly changed over the course of two thousand years. For example, Martin Heidegger points out an important nuance of the emergence of the concept of humanism, namely, as a kind of chauvinism – the division into humans (Romans) and non-humans (barbarians). This point of view is often overlooked, but it is critical to understanding the essence of this phenomenon. In the subsequent era of the Middle Ages, human was understood as the opposite of the divine, but in such realities, there were humanistic ideals and values. Already in the Renaissance, a return to the traditions of antiquity was announced, but the understanding of a person acquired a romantic character. Humanism clearly saw something more in a person than a person himself could demonstrate. It is for this metaphysical image that many critics of humanism have criticized this phenomenon. However, where there is criticism, there is progress, which is why this concept has gained a new round of discourse, which is why new trends have appeared that have brought the concept of humanism to a new theoretical level. As a historical phenomenon, humanism is faced with certain difficulties of new eras; because of these collisions, humanism is modified and adapted. Among humanism’s problems are multiculturalism, technological breakthroughs, and the need to search for new theories. In its development, the course of humanism takes on various forms and iterations. It is worth mentioning transhumanism (the idea of becoming someone more than just a human), posthumanism (philosophical views on human nature as a posthuman), and global humanism.

Keywords: the discourse of humanism, human, person, civilization process, transhumanism, posthumanism, global humanism.

References

Braidotti, B. (2013) The Posthuman. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.

Bugental, J.F.T. (1976) The Search for Existential Identity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Collier,A., and G. Calder (2009) Values and Ontology. Journal of Critical Realism, Volume 8, 63-90. https://doi.org/10.1558/jocr.v8i1.63

Fukuyama, F. (2002) Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Habermas, J. (2003) The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Heidegger, M. (1977) Basic Writings. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Kurzweil, R. (2012) How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed. Viking.

More, M. (1990) Transhumanism: Toward a Futurist Philosophy. Extropy, Volume 6, 6-12.

More, M. (2013) The Philosophy of Transhumanism. In The Transhumanist Reader, 3-17. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118555927.ch1

Planinc, E. (2020) Regenerating humanism. History of European Ideas, 46 (3), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2019.1697942

Porpora, D.V. (2017) Dehumanization in theory: anti-humanism, non-humanism, posthumanism, and trans-humanism. Journal of Critical Realism, Volume 16, 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2017.1340010

Sandberg, A. (2013) Morphological Freedom – Why We Not Just Want It, but Need It. In The Transhumanist Reader, 56–64. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118555927.ch5

Shook, J. R. (2021) Humanism in the Medieval World. In The Oxford Handbook of Humanism, 132-150. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190921538.013.1

Smiet, K. (2022) Rethinking or delinking? Said and Mignolo on humanism and the question of the human. Postcolonial Studies, Volume 25, 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030595

Takhar, J. H., R. Houston, and N. Dholakia (2022) Live very long and prosper? Transhumanist visions and ambitions in 2021 and beyond… Journal of Marketing Management, 38 (5-6), 399-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2069953

van Ingen, M. (2016). Beyond The Nature/Culture Divide? The Contradictions of Rosi Braidotti’s The Posthuman. Journal of Critical Realism, Volume 15, 530-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2016.1211371

Vandenberghe, F. (2004). Post-humanism, or the cultural logic of global capitalism. Société, Volume 24-25, 55-132.

Share and Cite

Akopian, Valerii and Viktoriya Timashova (2023) The Discourse of Humanism in the Context of the Civilizational Process in the 21st century. Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 30, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/30/2
Back to the list of Articles