1 Ivan Franko National University of Lviv (Lviv, Ukraine)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/25/15
Received: 6 February 2020 / Аccepted: 3 April 2020 / Published: 3 October 2020
View Full-Text Review Reports Cite This Paper
Abstract
The article presents a comparative analysis of neo-realist views of Russell and Whitehead on cosmology in the first decades of the 20th century. It is noted that despite the similarity of the basic theoretico-methodological principles of their philosophizing, these thinkers formulated philosophicocosmological conceptions that differed significantly from each other. The reason for this was that Russell, at the epistemological level, used the theory of degrees of certainty, and on the logical one he developed the theory of descriptions, but Whitehead, in contrast, was a supporter of the theory of critical realism in epistemology and the method of extensive abstraction in logic. All this influenced the former to pay more attention to the questions of analysis and, accordingly, to use the basic concepts of facts, logical atoms, and propositions, and the latter to focus on the question of synthesis and to consider the structure of being through the prism of concepts of actual entities, eternal objects and prehension. Hence the world for Russell is a static formation (set of events), and we only need to define its laws, and for the Whitehead world is a dynamic formation (set of processes), the laws of which still need to be understood. It is emphasized that as a result, Russell’s cosmology rejected the previous metaphysics, but Whitehead’s cosmology aimed at finding the origins of modern cosmology in the writings of early thinkers. Nevertheless, it is argued that the cosmological teachings of both had a significant influence on the development of analytic philosophy.
Keywords: neo-realist cosmology, fact, logical atom, actual entities, eternal objects, law, reality
References
Bansal, Deepak (2018) Whitehead’s Cosmology — Process Relational Perspective to Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 14(1), 27-39.
Berve, Aljoscha, and Maaßen, Helmut (eds). (2016) A. N. Whitehead’s thought through a new prism. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Epperson, Michael (2018) Quantum Mechanics and the Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. New York, Fordham University Press.
Hedrick, Lisa Landoe (2019) McDowell, Whitehead, and the Metaphysics of Agency. The Review of Metaphysics, 72(4), 767-782.
Jin, Yuelin (2020) On the Essence of Russell’s Neutral Monism (pp. 129-137). In: Jin, Yuelin. Tao, Nature and Man. Singapore, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2101-0_6.
Kling, Sheri D. (2019) Whitehead’s metaphysics as a cosmological framework for transpersonal psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 47(2), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000124.
Moore, George Edward (1903) The Refutation of Idealism. Mind, 12(48), 433-453.
Pribram-Day, Ivory (2018) Meinong’s Multifarious Being and Russell’s Ontological Variable: Being in Two Object Theories across Traditions at the Turn of the 20th Century. Open Philosophy, 1, 310-326. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0023.
Russell, Bertrand (1967) A History of Western Philosophy. New York, Simon and Schuster.
Russell, Bertrand (1970) An Outline of Philosophy. London, George Allen and Unwin.
Russell, Bertrand (1939) Dewey’s New Logic. In: Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.). The Philosophy of John Dewey. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 135-156.
Russell, Bertrand (1951) Human Knowledge — Its Scope And Limits. London, George Allen and Unwin.
Russell, Bertrand (1969) Our Knowledge of External World. London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Russell, Bertrand (1972) Philosophy of Logical Atomism. London; New York, Routledge.
Russell, Bertrand (1927) The Analysis of Matter. London, Kegan Paul & Co.
Russell, Bertrand (1922) The Analysis of Mind. London, Allen & Unwin.
Russell, Bertrand (1992) Theory of Knowledge. London, Routledge.
Russell, Bertrand (2001) The Scientific Outlook. New York, Routledge.
Stern, David G. (2018) Russell’s and Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomisms (pp. 115-132). In: Elkind, Landon, Landini, Gregory (eds). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Ihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94364-0_5.
Synytsia, Andrii (2017) Contemporary Analytic Philosophy: From the Pragmatics of Language to the Conceptualization of Consciousness. Lviv, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.
Wahl, Russell (2018) Russell in Transition 1914–1918: From Theory of Knowledge to “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism” (pp. 133-152). In: Elkind, Landon, Landini, Gregory (eds). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94364-0_6.
Whitehead, Alfred North (1933) Adventures of Ideas. New York, Macmillan Co. 1933. XII, 392 p.
Whitehead, Alfred North (1922) Principle of Relativity: with Applications to Physical Science. Cambridge, The University Press.
Whitehead, Alfred North (1978) Process and Reality. New York, The Free Press.
Whitehead, Alfred North (1929) Science and the Modern World. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Whitehead, Alfred North (1926) The Concept of Nature. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus / trans. by C. K. Ogden. London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.