1 National Transport University (Kyiv, Ukraine)
2 National Transport University (Kyiv, Ukraine)
Received: 6 May 2020 / Аccepted: 2 July 2020 / Published: 3 October 2020
The authors studied the problem of techno-humanitarian balance. A difference was found in approaches to the study of technological progress and its impact on the development of society. The ideas of transhumanism, existential risk, etc. suggested by Nick Bostrom, David Pearce, etc. provided a utilitarian attitude towards new technologies. The representatives of transhumanism proceeded from the idea that any technology is part of human nature and expanded its presence in life. Nazaretyan’s ideas were based on the opposite premise. Namely, man and technology have a different nature of origin. Hence, the need arises to adapt to a non-native environment and create certain restraining mechanisms. The societies that failed to adapt to the exponential spread of information and communication technologies in time undermined the natural and/or geopolitical foundations of their existence. In turn, the societies that have adapted to new technologies have achieved sustainable development and prosperity. The authors used the comparative method of research, as well as methods of modelling, analysis, and synthesis. The study resulted in the testing of two models of the relationship between society and technology, built on the Nazaretyan hypothesis and the Bostrom concept. The test results proved the effectiveness of the model, built on the concept of Bostrom. The model presents the general dynamic nature of man and technology.
Keywords: techno-humanitarian balance, Akop Nazaretyan, philosophy of transhumanism, technoengineering, existential risk, Nick Bostrom, process philosophy
Bazaluk, Oleg (2019) The Transformation of a Cultural Ideal in the Theories of Education According to Plato’s Line. Studia Warminskie, 56, 95-104. https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.4598
Bazaluk, Oleg, and Svitlana Balinchenko (2020) Dynamic Coordination of Internal Displacement: Return and Integration Cases in Ukraine and Georgia. Sustainability, 12, 4123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104123
Bickle, John, Peter Mandik, and Anthony Landreth (2019) The Philosophy of Neuroscience.
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/neuroscience/
Bostrom, Nick (2003) The Transhumanist FAQ, v. 2.1. World Transhumanist Association. Available online: https://www.nickbostrom.com/views/transhumanist.pdf
Bostrom, Nick (2013) Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority. Global Policy, 4: 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12002
Cathomas, Flurin, James W. Murrough, Eric J. Nestler, Ming-Hu Han, and Scott J. Russo (2019) Neurobiology of Resilience: Interface between Mind and Body. Biological Psychiatry, Volume 86, Issue 6: 410-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.04.011
Cheshko, Valentin T., Lida V. Ivanitskaya and Yulia V. Kosova (2014) Configuration of Stable Evolutionary Strategy of Homo Sapiens and Evolutionary Risks of Technological Civilization (the Conceptual Model Essay). Biogeosystem Technique, 1 (1): 58-68.
Cheshko, Valentin T., Yulia V. Kosova, and Valery I. Glazko (2015) Evolutionary Semantics of Anthropogenesis and Bioethics of Nbic-Technologies. Biogeosystem Technique, Vol. (5), Is. 3. https://doi.org/10.13187/bgt.2015.5.256
Churin, V., N. Vysotskaya, Yu. Sizova, E. Danilina, and D. Gorelov (2019) Distribution of mineral extraction revenue: an overview of international practice. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 13 (2): 66-74. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining13.02.066
Evstifeeva, E.A., A.A. Tyagunov, S.V. Rassadin, and S.I. Filippchenkova (2012) Humanities and Social Technologies to Develop Engineer’s Personal Potential in Self-Developing University Environment. Higher Education, 23-26. Available online: http://aeer.ru/filesen/io/m19/art_4.pdf
Humanity+ (2020) Available online: https://humanityplus.org/
Kastrup, Bernardo (2018) The Next Paradigm. Future Human Image, Volume 9, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/9/4
Khmil, Volodymyr, and Ihor Popovych (2019) Philosophical and psychological dimensionsof social expectations of personality. Anthropological measurements of philosophical research. 16, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.187540
Koucheryavy, Yevgeni, Ruslan Kirichek, Ruslan Glushakov, and Rustam Pirmagomedov (2017) Quo vadis, humanity? Ethics on the last mile toward cybernetic organism. Russian Journal of Communication, 9:3, 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419 .2017.1376561
Kouhossounon, Bernadin (2019) The Restitution of Cultural Property at the Heart of Cultural Diplomacy. Politické vedy, Vol. 22, No. 2, 78-97. http://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2019.22.2.78-97
Krichevsky, Sergey (2020) Creation of a “Cosmic” Human: Ideas, Technologies, Projects, Experience, Risks, Limitations, and Prospects. Future Human Image, Volume 13, 2020: 32-45. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/13/4
Lifková, Anna (2019) Digital power: Self-tracking Technologies through Michel Foucault Lens. Politické vedy, Volume 22, Number 4, 81-101. http://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2019.22.4.81-101
Lin, Ya-Wei, and Oleg Bazaluk (2020). Using Brain Science Theory to Analyze the Unity between Language Input and Output: Methodology Improvement Substantiation. Psycholinguistics, 27 (1), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-27-1-195-218
Nazaretyan, Akop P. (2001) Civilization Crises in the Universal History Context. Moscow: Mir.
Nazaretyan, Akop P. (2003) Power and Wisdom: Toward a History of Social Behavior. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33: 405-425. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-5914.2003.00224.x
Nazaretyan, Akop P. (2005) Western and Russian Traditions of Big History: A Philosophical Insight. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 36, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-005-7154-7
Nazaretyan, Akop P. (2020) The Twenty-First Century’s “Mysterious Singularity” in the Light of the Big History. In: Korotayev A., LePoire D. (eds) The 21st Century Singularity and Global Futures. World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33730-8_15
Pearce, David (2007) The abolitionist project. Available online: https://www.abolitionist.com/
Pinto, Nuno, José António Tenedório, António Pais Antunes, and Josep Roca Cladera (2013) Technologies for Urban and Spatial Planning: Virtual Cities and Territories. IGI Global.
Ross, Benjamin (2020) The Philosophy of Transhumanism: A Critical Analysis. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Seibt, Johanna (2020) Process Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/process-philosophy
Smirnov, Grigory and Alena Odintsova (2019) “Homo Nooeconomicus” as a Human Image for the Noospheric Epoch. Future Human Image, Volume 11, 91-97. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/11/10
Sokolov, Arkadiy V. (2019) Noosphere Man in the Library of Future. Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]. Vol. 68 (1): 7-17. https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608X-2019-68-1-7-17
Soroka, Larysa, and Kseniia Kurkova (2019) Artificial Intelligence and Space Technologies: Legal, Ethical and Technological Issues. Advanced Space Law, Volume 3, 131-139. https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/2019/3/11
Zhelnin, Anton I. (2014) Contemporary sociobiological crisis as techno-humanitarian disbalance. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Filosofia, Psihologia, Sociologia, Issue 4, 28-32.
Yakushik, Valentin (2019) Importance of Inter-Civilizational and Intra-Civilizational Dialogue in National State Consolidation and Development. Ukrainian Policymaker, Volume 4, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/4/11