Between Physics and Metaphysics — on Determinism, Arrow of Time and Causality

Article
Open Access
by Grzegorz P. Karwasz1
1 University Nicolaus Copernicus (Torun, Poland)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/24/2
Received: November 9, 2019 / Accepted: December 10, 2019 / Published: January 25, 2020

View Full-Text Review Reports Cite This Paper

Abstract

Contemporary physics, with two Einstein’s theories (called “relativity” what can be interpreted erroneously) and with Heisenberg’s principle of indeterminacy (better: “lack of epistemic determinism”) are frequently interpreted as a removal of the causality from physics. We argue that this is wrong. There are no indications in physics, either classical or quantum, that physical laws are indeterministic, on the ontological level. On the other hand, both classical and quantum physics are, practically, indeterministic on the epistemic level: there are no means for us to predict the detailed future of the world. Additionally, essentially all physical principles, including the arrow of time and the conservation of energy could be, hypothetically, violated (with some exceptions in the world of heavier quarks, and probably, the cosmological arrow of time). However, in contrast to Hume’s skepticism, we have no experimental evidence that the causality can be removed or even “hung on” in any case. The text contains some didactical-like issues, as well.Keywords: Quantum mechanics, determinism, causality, classical physics

References

Abbott, Brian P. et al. (2017) Multi-messenger Observation of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. The Astrophysical Journal, 848, L12.

Alcubierre, Michael (1994) The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11(5), L73–L77.

Aspec, Allan (2015) Viewpoint: Closing the Door on Einsteins and Bohr’s Quantum Debate. Physics, APS, Dec. 16th. Available online: https://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/123

Barrow, John (1999) Between Inner Space and Outer Space. Essays on science, art and philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barlow, Roger (2014) CP violation: Recent Results from BaBar. SUSY 2014. Available online: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/21275/1/Talk.pdf [22.12.2018]

Bohm, David (1980) Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Boschi, Davide, et al. (1998) Experimental Realization of Teleporting an Unknown Pure Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels. Phys. Rev. Lett, 80, 112-116.

Churchland, Patricia (2016) “Neurophilosophy.” How Biology Influences Philosophy. New Foundations for Naturalism. ed. by D. Livingstone Smith, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Crease, Robert (2017) Philosophy of Physics. Bristol, IOP Publishing.

Einstein, Albert and Natan Rosen (1935) The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity. Phys. Rev. 48, 73-77.

Einstein, Albert (1994) Autobiografia Scientifica. Torino, Bollato Boringhieri.

Erhart, Jacqueline, et al. (2012) Experimental demonstration of a universality valid errordisturbance uncertainty relation in spin measurements. Nature Physics, 8, 185-189.

Fujikawa, Kazuo (2013) Conditionally valid uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. A 80, 12126.

Fuller, Robert W., and John A.Wheller (1962) Causality and Multiply-Connected SpaceTime. Phys. Rev. 128, 919.

Geer, Samuel, et al. (2000) New Limit on CPT Violation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 590.

Karwasz, Grzegorz P. et al. (2004) Application of positron annihilation techniques for semiconductor studies. J. Alloys and Compounds, 382, 244.

Karwasz, Grzegorz, P. (2005) Positrons — an alternative probe to electrons, Eur. J. Phys. D 35, 267-278.

Karwasz, Grzegorz (2016) II costante progredire della frontiera tra teologia e scienza: Metafisica. Scientia et Fides, 4 (1), 151-172.

Laloë, Franck (2001) Do we really understand quantum mechanics? Strange correlations, paradoxes and theorems. American Journal of Physics, 69, 655-701.

Laplace, Pierre-Simon (1840) Essai Philosophique sur les Probabilités. Paris, Bachelier.

Lindley, David (2005) Focus: The birth of wormholes. Physics, American Physical Society, 25/03/2005. Available online: https://physics.aps.org/story/v15/st11

López, Cristian (2018) Qué puede decirnos la relatividad general respecto de la flecha del tiempo. Manuscripto, 41 (3), 85-123.

Lutz, Eric and Sergio Ciliberto (2015) Information: From Maxwell’s demon to Landauer eraser. Physics Today, 30.

Margenau, Henri (1941) Metaphysical Elements in Physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 13, 176-189.

Pearlmutter, Saul (2003) Supernovae, Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe. Physics Today, 54, 53.

Polkinghorne, John C. (1989) Science and Providence. God’s interaction with the World. Boston, New Science Library.

Rossi, Bruno and David B. Hall (1941) Variation of the Rate of Decay of Mesotrons with Momentum. Phys. Rev. 59 (3), 223-228.

Schroer, Bert (2011) Pascual Jordan’s legacy and the ongoing research in quantum field theory. Eur. Phys. J. H 35, 377- 434.

Silva, Ignacio (2013) Werner Heisenberg and Thomas Aquinas on Natural Indeterminism. New Blackfriars, 94 (1054), 635–653.

Susskind, Leonard, and Art Friedman (2014) Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum. New York, Basic Books.

Tegmark, Max et al. (2005) Anthropic predictions for neutrino mass. Phys. Rev. D 71, 103523.

Tipler, Paul A. and Ralph, A. Llewellyn (2008) Modern Physics. 5th Edition. New York, W. H. Freeman.

Wilczek, Franck (2016) Following Time’s Arrow to the Universe’s Biggest Mistrery. Available online: https://www.wired.com/2016/01/times-arrow-may-point-to-the-universes-missing-mass/ [9.11.2019]

Share and Cite

Karwasz, Grzegorz P. (2020) Between Physics and Metaphysics — on Determinism, Arrow of Time and Causality. Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 24, 15-28. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/24/2
Back to the list of Articles