1 Dnipro University of Technology (Dnipro, Ukraine)
2 Dnipro University of Technology (Dnipro, Ukraine)
3 Dnipro University of Technology (Dnipro, Ukraine)
Received: February 15, 2019 / Accepted: May 2, 2019 / Published: October 10, 2019
View Full-Text Review Reports Cite This Paper
The article presents the results of empirical studies of correlation of culture and innovations. Sociocultural factors of innovative development have been revealed. The present research has established the dual nature of innovations that finds itself in a symbiosis of an innovation and a creativity product. This fact allows us to view this phenomenon as a result of interaction of the economic and sociocultural spheres of society’s life activity: an innovative impulse arises from a person’s desire to gain an economic benefit, on the one hand, and from a desire to reach the originality that is specified by traditions of a certain culture, on the other hand. Consequently, innovative activity depends directly on socio-cultural values that determine human dispositions, habits and motivations.Sh. Schwartz’s calculation of value indices allowed us to reveal the human value priorities in twentyone countries of Europe in terms of their influence on person’s innovative dispositions, using the data body of International comparison project “European Social Survey” (2012-2016). It was shown that in the countries with dominant “Openness to Changes” values, inventiveness and innovativeness are more pronounced if compared to the countries where “Conservatism” values prevail. There has been demonstrated the special importance for innovative development of “Self-Transcendence” values that facilitate the formation of an environment favourable for implementing the institutional innovations. The research has proved that average Ukrainians have no value disposition to innovations. This fact creates a cultural barrier on the way of Ukraine’s innovative development and requires governmental impact on these processes. The authors have taken into account the global modern development tendencies that manifest themselves in strengthening the countries’ interdependency, particularly, in more rapid cultural convergence, gradual unification of values, with cultural diversity preserved. With this in mind, to intensify the innovative activity in Ukraine, the authors suggested a strategy of Ukraine’s deeper integration into the world science and technology space as an equal partner as well as searching for its niche in a constantly developing world segment of creative and innovative activity, with cultural diversity being a powerful source of development.
Keywords: innovations, innovative activity, cross-cultural analysis of innovations, person’s innovative dispositions, socio-cultural innovation factors, Schwartz’s value orientations for Ukraine, cultural barriers of innovative development
Dollinger, Stephen, Philip Burke, and Nathaniel Gump (2007) Creativity and Values. Creativity Research Journal, 19 (2-3), 91-103.
Indicators of innovative activity, 2017: statistical compilation (2017) Available online: https://issek.hse.ru/data/2017/03/15/1170155477/Innovations%202017.pdf
Lebedeva, Nadezhda and Alexander Tatarko (2009) Culture as a factor of social progress. Moscow.
Lebedeva, Nadezhda and Alexander Tatarko (2011) Culture and Economic Behaviours. Moscow.
North, Douglass (2005) Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Prinston University Press.
Pylypenko, Yurii (2012) The technological system of society and its structure. Scientific Bulletin of the NMU, 6 (132), 147–153.
Pylypenko, Hanna (2017) Socio-cultural factors of economic development. Dnipro.
Research and development in 2018. Science, technology and innovation (2018) Available online: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua
Sapir, Jac (2001) Towards an economic theory of inhomogeneous systems. Moscow.
Shane, Scott (1992) Why do some societies invent more than others. Journal of Business Venturing. 7, 29-46.
Schwartz, Shalom, and Wolfgang Bilsky (1990) Towards a theory of the universal structure and content of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.
Schwartz, Shalom, and Mark Ros (1995) Values in the West: A theoretical and empirical challenge to the Individualism-Collectivism cultural dimension. World Psychology, 1, 99 –122.
Schwartz, Shalom, and Bardy, Aurtur (1997) Influence of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18, 385-410.
Schwartz, Shalom (2011) Values: Individual and cultural. Cambridge.
Schwartz, Shalom (2012) An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2 (1), 1-20.
Shumpeter, Jozef (2007) The Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Moscow.
The Global Innovation Index 2018 (2019) INSEAD, WIPO, Cornell University. Available online: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf
The European Social Survey 2018 (2018) European Social Research. Available online: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/
Yakovets, Yurii (2003) Rent, Anti-Rent, Quasi-Rent in Global Civilization Dimension. Moscow.
World Data Atlas (2018) World and regional statistics, national data, maps and ratings. Available online: https://knoema.ru/atlas