1 Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia)
2 Dubna State University (Astana, Kazakhstan)
3 Dubna State University (Dubna, Russia)
Received: 25 March 2017 / Accepted: 10 April 2017 / Published: 30 January 2018
View Full-Text Review Reports Cite This Paper
A series of independent calculations done by scientists from various countries and professions show that the 21st century is expected to be crucial for the human history. Current generations’ activities will determine how exactly the turning point will happen and what direction the subsequent evolution will go.From time immemorial, the relative sustainability of human communities (from primitive tribes to nations, social classes or world confessions) has been provided by the image of a common enemy. Intergroup conflicts have been abridging in-group violence and with it, have been setting the vector for the creation of life’s meanings. Yet, the current level of technological development completed by blurring lines both between war and non-war technologies and between the conditions of peace and war has made this psychological inertia suicidal. Therefore, the problem of life’s meanings is becoming the nucleus of the 21st century global problems: Will the human mind prove ready to develop strategic meanings beyond religious or quasi-religious ideologies, which are always built on, the “them-us” mental matrix? Insights of great philosophers and prophets, as well as special socio-psychological experiments and some crucial episodes in political history have demonstrated that besides the image of a common enemy, both human solidarity and strategic meanings can be built on the image of a common cause (not aimed at an enemy agent), although the experience of assimilating this kind of construct by the mass consciousness is scanty. Instead, historical evidence is abundant showing that after long periods without real or potential wars, life’s meanings “hang up” and the masses feel nostalgia for new demons. Actually, we observe an intensification of this trend in many regions of our planet accompanied by a growing instability in global geopolitics. An international educational program designed to develop cosmopolitan worldviews free from group-versus-group attachments is suggested in the paper.
Keywords: forecasting, non-linearity, menace, danger, risk, singularity, scenarios, war, peace, techno-humanitarian balance, ideology, life’s meaning
Chaisson, Eric J. (2005) Cosmic Evolution: Synthesizing Evolution, Energy, and Ethics. Philosophy & Science (Filosofskie Nauki), Vol. 5, 92-105.
Christian, David (1991) The Case for ‘Big History’. Journal of World History, 2 (2), 223–238.
Christian, David (2004) Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. Berkeley: Calif.: Univ. of California Press.
Cockburn, James S. (1991) Patterns of Violence in English Society: Homicide in Kent, 1560-1985. Past & Present, 130: 70-106.
Davies, Paul (2004) The Cosmic Blueprint: New Discoveries in Nature’s Creative Ability to Order the Universe. Philadelphia & London: Templeton Press.
Deutsch, David (1997) The Fabric of Reality. London, N.Y.: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.
Duncker, Karl (1935) Erster Teil Struktur und Dynamik von Lösungsprozessen Seite Kap. Zur Psychologie des Produktiven. Denkens. Berlin: Springer.
Eisner, Manuel (2003) Long-term Historical Trend in Violent Crime. Crime & Justice, 30: 83-142.
Elias, Norbert (2000) The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1939/2000.
From Big Bang to Global Civilization: A Big History anthology (2017) In 3 volumes. Grinin, Leonid E., Korotayev, Andrei V., Rodrigue, Barry (eds.). Delhi: Primus Books, 2015/2017.
Global Study of Homicide (2011) Trends, Contexts, Data. UNODC.
Gurr, Ted R. (1981) Historical Trends in Violent Crime: A Critical Review of the Evidence. Crime & Justice: An annual Review of Research, 3(29), 295-353.
Jantsch, Eric (1980) The Self-Organizing Universe. Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution. N.Y.: Pergamon Press.
Joy, Bill (2000) Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us? Wired, April: 238-262.
Kaku, Mitio (2014) The Future of the Mind: The Scientific Quest to Understand, Enhance, and Empower the Mind. N.Y. etc.: Doubleday.
Keeley, Lawrence H. (1996) War before Civilization. The Myth of the Peaceful Savage. N.Y.: Oxford Univ. Press.
Krug, Etienne G., Dahlberg, Linda L., Mercy, James A., Zwi, Anthony B. and Lozano, Rafael (2002) Eds. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Kurzweil, Raimond (2005) The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. N.Y.: PB.
Merton, Robert K. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. N.Y.: Free Press.
Moiseev, Nikita N. (1991) Universal evolutionism: Position and corollaries. Problems of Philosophy (Voprosi Filosofii), 3: 3-28.
Mosionzhnik, Leonid A. (2012) Technology of Historical Myth. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoria.
Nazaretyan, Akop P. (1991) Intelligence in the Universe: Origin, Formation and Perspectives. Moscow: Nedra.
Nazaretyan, Akop P. (2005) Western and Russian Traditions in Big History: A Philosophical Insight. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 36: 63-80.
Nazaretyan, Akop P. (2009) Technology, Psychology and Catastrophes: On the Evolution of NonViolence in Human History. Social Evolution & History, VIII, 2, 102-132.
Nazaretyan, Akop P. (2010) Virtualization of Social Violence: A Sign of Our Époque? Societal and Political Psychology International Review, 1, 2: 23-36.
Nazaretyan, Akop P. (2015) Mega-History and the 21st Century Singularity Puzzle. Philosophy and Cosmology, Vol.15, 84-98.
Nazaretyan, Akop P. (2017) Non-Linear Futures: Mega-History, Complexity Theory, Anthropology & Psychology for Global Forecasting. 4th ed. Moscow: Argamak-Media.
Panov, Alexander D. (2005a) Completion of the Planetary Cycle of Evolution? Philosophy & Science (Filosofskie nauki), 3-4: 42-49, 31-50.
Panov, Alexander D. (2005b) Scaling Law of the Biological Evolution and the Hypothesis of the Self-Consistent Galaxy Origin of Life. Advances in Space Research, 36: 220–225.
Panov, Alexander D. (2017) The Structure of Reality, or Where to Find the Final Theory? Philosophy and Cosmology, Volume 19, 74-94.
Pinker, Steven (2011) The Better Angels of Our Nature. The Decline of Violence in History and Its Causes. N.Y.: Viking Penguin.
Rees, Martin J. (1997) Before the Beginning. Our Universe and Others. N.Y.: Helix Books.
Rees, Martin J. (2003) Our Final Century: Will the Human Race Survive the Twenty First Century? N.Y.: Basic Books.
Rozanov, Alexei Yu (2009) Life Conditions on Early Earth After 4.0 Billion Years Ago. Problems of the Origins of Life. Moscow: Institute of Paleontology: 185-201.
Sherif, Muzafer, Harvey, Oj, White, B. Jack, Hood, William R. and Sherif, Carolyn W. (1961) Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robber’s Cave Experiment. Norma, Oklahoma: Univ. of Oklahoma Press.
Singularity Hypotheses (2012) A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. Eden, Amnon H. Moor, James H., Søraker, Johnny H. and Steinhart, Eric (eds.). Berlin Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag.
Smolin, Lee (2014) The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time: A Proposal in Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Snooks, Graeme D. (1996) The Dynamic Society. Exploring the Sources of Global Change. London and N.Y.: Routledge.
Spier, Fred (1996) The Structure of Big History. From the Big Bang until Today. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Univ. Press.
Taleb, Nassim N. (2016) The “Long Peace” Is a Statistical Illusion. Available online: http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/pinker.pdf
Weinberg, Steven (1993) The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe. N.Y.: Basic Books.